Fiscal Cliff Looms as Congress Gets Back to Work
President, Congress have just a few days to avert automatic tax increases and spending cuts.
Congress and President Obama are racing against the clock this week as they make one last attempt to hammer out a deal to avoid the so-called “fiscal cliff” the U.S. government is set to go over on New Year’s Day.
Without a compromise deal to lower the deficit, the government will face a self-imposed deadline that triggers both spending cuts and higher taxes. Congress itself set the Jan. 1 deadline after failing to come to a budget compromise earlier this year.
On Jan. 1, the George W. Bush-era tax cuts will expire, raising taxes on nearly all Americans. In addition, $1.2 trillion in spending cuts to defense and government programs will go into effect.
The week before Christmas, it looked like a deal was possible, as Obama and Congressional leaders were just a few hundred million away in taxes and spending.
But Congress recessed the Friday before Christmas after Speaker of the House Republican John Boehner failed Thursday evening to pass his “Plan B,” which would have extended tax cuts for most Americans and raised taxes on those making more than $1 million.
| Starbucks baristas are writing "come together" on all cups in the Washington, DC, area to encourage Congress and the President to come together to fix the fiscal cliff issue. For more information about this initiative, go to www.patch.com/fixthedebt. |
Earlier in the day, the House did pass a bill that moved billions in cuts to defense spending to other areas of government spending, including entitlements and programs for lower-income Americans. Obama said he would veto that bill should it reach his desk.
In a statement issued last Thursday, Boehner said, “The House did not take up the tax measure today because it did not have sufficient support from our members to pass. Now it is up to the president to work with Senator (Harry) Reid on legislation to avert the fiscal cliff."
In response, the White House released a brief statement: “The President’s main priority is to ensure that taxes don’t go up on 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses in just a few short days. The President will work with Congress to get this done and we are hopeful that we will be able to find a bipartisan solution quickly that protects the middle class and our economy.”
What does going over cliff mean?
What going over the cliff actually means for the recovering U.S. economy is still up for debate among economists and political analysts.
The cliff is more of a slope in terms of the timeline for spending cuts — they take effect over the next decade — but the still-recovering jobs market will take a hit and the combination of higher taxes and spending cuts by the government and businesses could send the economy back into recession, some economists predict.
In the meantime, executives in the defense industry and CEOs of companies large and small are having difficulty budgeting for next year as uncertainty remains about both tax rates and cuts in government spending.
Consumers will feel the difference immediately with the expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts. The Tax Policy Center, a non-partisan group, estimates middle-class households would see an increase of almost $2,000 in federal taxes, or about $75 per bi-weekly paycheck.
Following a visit to a middle-class family in Falls Church, VA, Obama said:
“For them to be burdened unnecessarily because Democrats and Republicans aren’t coming together to solve this problem gives you a sense of the costs involved in very personal terms. … Obviously, it would also have an impact on our economy, because if this family has a couple of thousand dollars less to spend, that translates into $200 billion of less consumer spending next year. And that’s bad for businesses large and small. It’s bad for our economy. It means less folks are being hired, and we can be back in a downward spiral instead of the kind of virtuous cycle that we want to see."
Jan Schmidt
2:40 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Today the House opened to do no business, The Speaker refused to call members back into session. The next session is set for Monday the 31st... Chances are this game played to keep the super-rich safe from taxes is just fine for Boehner. How more out of touch with America can he be?
One Man Wolf Pack
3:52 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Jan, the house passed legislation to address both taxation and spending in the "cliff" but Harry Reid refuses to even bring it to the floor of the Senate.
Boehner, offered to raise taxes on the wealthy and two things happened; 1) the Democrats offered not concrete cuts and 2) he was hung out to dry for even trying to pass a tax only version on those above 1 million in income.
If you want to point fingers Boehner actually tried, how much legislation that addresses the entire problem has the senate or the president proposed? ZERO
They only want to raise taxes and spend more money, and maybe just maybe the Dems will offer to "reduce" future spending once they have tripled it.
Federal and local the Dem game is the same raise spending multiple fold and then "cut" a little and hope no one notices. Hassan has already pitched that in department memos, Obama has done it with the deficit (not debt Jan, you have confused those in the past) and the only ones fooled are those who do not actually look at the math.
Why can't we have a balanced budget? If you think we can't spend less then just how much more taxes do we need? How much is enough taxation?
Jan Schmidt
12:20 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
The last one, even his own party wouldn't touch.
The common consensus is Boehner will not pass this until the new year and he is re-elected as leader.
And Charlie - don't confuse the federal budget with the state budget, they are two very different beasts. They serve different functions for our economy and have to treated as such.
I think the biggest issue is that people have been told for decades that magically your taxes can be reduced every year. Does the cost of anything go down? Can you spend more on things like war when you reduce your income? Can you continue to allow tax breaks for companies that spend that money outside the country? Can you support companies that take the country's support and pay it out to their investors? These bills have gone through the House and been shot down by Boehner... every single one.
In fact, here's a list of some of the blocked bills
GOP blocked bills:
Blocked bill to aid Small Business
Blocked Unemployment extension
Blocked Bank Reform Bills
Blocked Campaign Finance Reform and open Contributions Law
Blocked MULTIPLE Jobs Bills
Blocked Infrastructure Bill
Blocked Ending Tax Breaks for companies that Outsource Jobs
Blocked Wall Street Reform
Blocked Energy Legislation
Blocked Mine Safety Bill
Blocked Oil Spill Liability Cap increase
Blocked Bill to lower Oil Company Tax Breaks
Blocked Bill to impose charging American Oil Companies on Oil achieved in the Gulf
One Man Wolf Pack
12:40 pm on Friday, December 28, 2012
Well Jan,
The State and Federal budgets are different; kudos to you for recognizing. The Democratic strategy for each is the same however; raise the defict multiple fold and then reduce it a little and hope no one notices. (And the masses, sadly, rarely do.
You ellude to the concept of "inflation", and prices always going up, well at the federal level I am confused here, isn't taxation at the federal level complete bases on percentages? Aren't percentages ratios of another value? If those values change then so do the actual ammount of tax as they are ratios.....
State taxes in NH are predominatntly fixed to an asset value, your land property and improvements. But doesn't land also appreciate over time in effect representing this inflation you speak of?
How much taxation will it take Jan?
What is enough?
What is fair?
News Flash
2:48 pm on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Reflection of the financial incompetence of the democrat party. Wait til you see what the fools do in NH.