patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Greatest Person

Ron Paul 'Leap for Liberty'

Paul supporters try to win over undecided voters at skydiving party.

 

Michael Layon and friends will plummet from a helicopter as it hovers tonight over his home.

It's the "Leap for Liberty," and likely a New Hampshire Primary first. The skydiving show will greet Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul on his latest swing through the state.

"The Leap for Liberty event will be specifically tailored to address the questions and concerns of undecided voters and be a fundraising-free zone," Erica and Michael Layon of Derry described it.

Paul supporters are welcome, but they do not want to be just preaching to the faithful, Erica Layon said in a phone interview ahead of the event.

"There's a lot of people who are still undecided," she said. "It is still pretty open."

Recent polls indicate a fluid race for the Republican presidential nomination. A Fox News Poll out Sept. 28 found 13 percent did not know who they would support in the race. Two polls last week of likely Republican voters in New Hampshire – polls by American Research Group and Suffolk University/7News – pegged the undecided vote at 12 percent.

Undecided voters traditionally break late, of course.

To Erica Layon, that's because some candidates have evolving views and opinions. That's not the case with Doctor Paul, a Texas congressman, she said. She said that is one reason she likes Paul. She said he is one candidate who will not wave his finger in the air trying to figure out which way the political winds are blowing.

The Paul party starts at 6 tonight. The actual "Leap for Liberty," however, is contingent on the winds blowing right.

About this column: Highlighting people who make extraordinary contributions to Exeter. Related Topics: Erica and Michael Layon, FITN, Leap for Liberty, New Hampshire Primary, Republican presidential nominee, Ron Paul, U.S. Constitution, and Undecided voters

Patch_comments_icon

Dan Tuohy

4:17 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

Your comment here is duly noted. Thanks for making it, Brad. We've great respect for Dr. Paul and all the candidates. And your opinion, too. What is Dr. Paul's greatest strength?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

4:42 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

You just deleted another one of that other guy's comments. I read the last comment he posted, and it was completely tame. This is not appropriate usage behavior of the patch blog. If you want to disable commenting, that's fine, but this is not your Facebook wall.

Louis Nardozi

7:44 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011

Why are we in such a pickle in the first place?

The greatest benefit our government gives us BAR NONE is the ability to relocate to another state at ANY TIME with all legally acquired possessions. When our government has FEW federal powers, as it should, 99% of the body of law comes from the state you live in. What does that really mean? It means if you are a Tea Party type and want limited services and low taxes, you can move to a state that has them - whenever you want! Similarly, if you are of a more liberal persuasion, you can move to a state with single payer health insurance, paid college benefits, safety nets for the unemployed and a host of other benefits - just by moving to another state. Whether conservative, liberal or centrist you are FAR more likely to find a state run the way you'd like it than you would with a one-size-fits-all plan.

Further, the viability of these governments would also rest on the business environment they provide to business owners and consumers both. Things that cannot be made economically in a high tax state can be made in a low tax state and shipped in. High value products are more likely to be made in somewhat higher tax states because their employees are more in demand and so garner better working conditions.
The REAL point is competition. Just as competition brings us cheaper computers and cell phones, so would competition bring us better cheaper government that truly serves the end user.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

8:59 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

Sure... and people can move into my state and begin taking apart the social networks we've always had to make our state prosper. The invasion of the Me-me-me-ers is making decisions that will send the costs down to the towns and cities and to the future. Isn't that just wonderful...

No pure system will ever work in any society, pure capitalism leads to degradation of the environment, the health and welfare of the citizens, and a class division that does nothing but expand. Competition alone is not the best solution for everyone, limiting our government isn't the answer - its making sure our government answers to us. You don't want money spent on X, I don't want money spent on Y... its up to our government to manage both in finding the best solution for ALL of us.

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:46 am on Friday, September 30, 2011

Jan has it right. There hasn't been any economic system to date that has worked. What Ron Paul supported has already been tried. Does anyone remember the 1800s? The reasons why we have regulations at all is because left to themselves, businesses serve themselves. I think most people that support Ron Paul only heard the "legalize pot" argument. So, while I think it's nice and all that a bunch of potheads want legalization of their vice, I doubt their economic acumen. I liked his interview this week on The Daily Show, where he supported legalizing heroin. Literally and specifically. It's this kind of extremism that will prevent him from being elected, which is for the best because "it's all about me" with Ron Paul.

I'm still waiting for these selfish cost cutters to relieve me of my property taxes. I don't have any kids, but I have to pay for someone else's kids to go to school. Isn't that against the philosophy of the tea party? Or is it only that services you use are legitimate? And this is why that philosophy fails also. If it is truly everyone for themselves, and nobody wants to help pay for anything unless it's something they use, then you don't have a society. You have tribes.

derek

1:47 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

gas prices go up, yet mobile is recording record high profits... taxes go up, yet we sell our bridges to foreign countries.. billions are spent on war, yet we americans have very limited soldiers on our homeland here to protect us if something were to seriously go wrong.... how does any of this makes sense??? there's all this talk about jobs, but what good are the jobs if they pay a minimum salary ?have you ever tried to support a family on a minimum wage? you can't. people don't want know where jobs that only makes the c e os rich. decent jobs like landscaping only pay 10 dollars an hour because the truck full of foreigners will do it for 5

Reply

derek

1:51 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

please excuse my punctuation I'm using voice recognition

Reply

Louis Nardozi

7:01 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

That's just silly. You think laws are written to protect YOU? YOU, with no money to lobby? YOU, who are limited in your ability to make campaign contributions? YOU, who don't have million dollar jobs to hand out when our fine elected officials retire? Legislation isn't even WRITTEN by our legislators anymore - it's written exclusively by lobbyists. DownsizeDC.org is trying to get legislation passed to limit that, you might give them a look see too.
I think when you read about the 1800s you read only one type of book - the ones written to sell you on just such programs as you have unabashedly supported. Yet that was not the only thing happening in the 1800s. For instance, did you know there WAS no middle class until the higher wages the 1800s brought gave people the ability to save up and buy their own lands? It is part of the predictable tendency to think things long ago were the same as now, or different in only a few particulars. This is NOT the case, so when you go reading biographies, remember those are rich or famous people, NOT the average guy back then. The ability to own actual property, and an actual house which no one could take from you was a VERY big deal, though we take it for granted today.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

9:12 pm on Friday, September 30, 2011

Clearly you know my reading list through your psychic powers. But seriously, how about the railroad companies? How about Rockefeller? Ron Paul would love these things, but to anyone with a knowledge of history, we know what happened with both of those. That's why we don't allow markets to be completely "free." It was only freedom for the guys at the top(remember, women's suffrage came later).

Leave a comment