As the Legislature begins to meet in earnest in Concord, there is no lack of issues waiting to be addressed in the coming months.
One particular challenge policymakers have to contend with as they craft the FY 2014-2015 budget is the lasting legacy of tax cuts enacted during the previous legislative session. All told, the tax cuts enacted in 2011 and 2012 will reduce tax collections by close to $90 million over the coming biennium.
To put that sum in perspective, initial estimates suggest that the state may see only about $110 million in revenue growth in the coming budget cycle – at the same time that universities, community colleges, hospitals, and hard-working families across the state continue to suffer from more than $400 million in budget cuts imposed during the last budget cycle.
Importantly, several of these recent tax cuts have yet to take effect. Several others are only just now in the process of being implemented. For instance, one change to the state’s Business Enterprise Tax will not become effective until July 2014.
This means that state businesses have not yet seen any change in what they owe the state – and the legislature still has the option of suspending or repealing some of these changes.
In weighing this option, it’s worth knowing that there’s little or no evidence that cutting business taxes benefits the state’s economy. Numerous studies suggest that business tax reductions are far less effective than investments in education and infrastructure in promoting economic growth.
What’s more, business taxes in New Hampshire are already comparatively low. A report released last year found that the total state and local taxes paid by businesses in New Hampshire amounted to 4.6 percent of private sector gross state product, substantially below the national mark of 5.0 percent.
Consequently, legislators should consider repealing or suspending these sorts of changes in tax law until state tax collections have fully rebounded from the economic downturn.
Ready About
7:33 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
It is the democrats that are spending too much.
Richard C Barnes
9:28 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
I wouldn't give this "article" too much consideration. The group who wrote it, the New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute, is a left wing group run by Jeff McLynch. Jeff is a known Democrat who has worked with Soros in the past fronting NH groups pushing for a state wide income tax. They are a sub group of another group called the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities who's goal is to promote the goals of the Democratic party and "economic justice".
And if you go to the website for NHFPI, the group who wrote this "article", they even admit that their goal is to promote "public policies that foster economic opportunity and prosperity" that have "emphasis on low- and moderate-income families and individuals".
Since the groups entire goal is to find ways to justify an income tax of course they'd find problems with "revenue" because it justifies their main arguments.
Proud Conservative
10:58 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
We don't have a revenue problem. We have a spending problem. Keep spending within revenues and the budget problem disappears. Millions of families and businesses do it every day. It''s not rocket science. It's known as fiscal responsibility.
Atlant Schmidt
8:16 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
Proud Conservative:
So what's your plan to fix all the "Red-Tagged" bridges around the state? All the potholes in the road? And so on?
Does your attitude really work at home? When the washing machine breaks, do you tell your wife "Sorry honey, it's not a revenue problem, it's a spending problem. 'Better go down to the stream and pound the laundry with rocks."
JP
11:09 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
Well said!!
Mark
8:27 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
When your washing machine breaks, you can't go to your boss and say that you need "additional revenue" to fix it. You take the money from a different part of your budget, and get it fixed. Again, not rocket science.
steve forte
8:28 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
The obvious approach would be to raise the fuel tax . People would back it if and only if it went into a dedicated fund just to be used for road and bridge repair. The minute ity is stolen and put into the general fund you will lose credability .
Bill from Merrimack
10:09 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
This right here is the way to go.
No Longer interested
1:04 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
"The minute it is stolen and put in the general fund you will lose credibility".
NH has a constitutional amendment that prohibits this.
Survivor.
8:31 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
The Democrats begin to talk about tax increases. Didn't take long did it. What a bunch of idiots.
Reality Geezer
9:29 am on Friday, January 11, 2013
Cut the cuts.....................
No Longer interested
1:05 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
Tax cuts increase state revenue,
Wage cuts help working people,
and cut off your nose to spite your face.
steve forte
1:56 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
So Ray if we raise the fuel tax say 3 cents that money can never be used for anything else the way the law stands now? Is that correct?
No Longer interested
3:56 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
According to the state constitution, this is correct. I believe, that a few years ago there was a law suit brought on by the trucking association because the state tried using state highway dollars for a study associated with a commuter rail station.
steve forte
6:00 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
Sounds like a no brainer. Raise the fuel tax. No rerason folks not using the roads should be paying for them.
Survivor.
10:15 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
This years Democrats are blowing the budget already. Via spending too much.
Phil Wilson
12:01 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
"the state may see only about $110 million in revenue growth in the coming budget"
So with over 100 million extra dollars, the state still cannot live within its means? Must be we elected a Democrat controlled government again.