patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

We Should be Proud of Hillary Clinton's Public Service

I entered law school in September 1968, at the start of three years that would see unbelievable student unrest and unrestrained outrage over the Vietnam War.  Protests upset campus life to the point where one of the law school professors told the assembled students that we were part of the worst generation, and that none of us would amount to anything, ever.

Well, I can’t speak for anyone who was there in the room, but I do want to say that one member of my generation did amount to something, and not just once, but throughout her public life. I’m speaking of course of Hillary Clinton, whose life of service to this country makes me proud to be a member of the generation born just at the end of World War ll. It’s hard to imagine someone who has contributed more to the well-being of this nation and all humanity.  She has offered wisdom, hard work, endurance and good judgment to the task of making the world a safer place, and she has done so in a way that just makes things better.

I’m sure I’m among millions who have signed email thank you notes, and wished her well in every way. But in this note I want to say it plain:  Thank you, Hillary Rodham Clinton for all you have done for us.  And thank you for showing that members of our generation could, and did, amount to something truly great.

Peter Hoe Burling, Cornish.  The writer is a former legislator and currently serves on the DNC.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

1:36 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Swamp Fox:

And you've done what, exactly, that matches Hillary Clinton's accomplishments in public service?

Atlant Schmidt

1:37 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Peter:

Hear, hear!

2016 will be an interesting year, won't it?

Reply

Swamp Fox

2:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Hillarys term as Secretary is called failure. Here is a hint, never be an ambassador working for her. You become DEAD.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Really??

5:25 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

What a dope, do you know how many people died in American Embassies BEFORE Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State?

SoxPats

3:09 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I am among the millions upon millions who signed thank you e- mails to Hillary.
I'll say it again. Thank you so much Hillary for your service to our country.
Hope to see you in 2016 !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hilltopper

3:17 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Mr./Ms. SoxPats,

You should add "Hillary" to your moniker---

All three look good on paper, are adored for their past performances, but now fold when the games are actually played

Comment_arrow

JGONH

6:35 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Right now their is 47,291,352 people in the United States on food stamps. We know which party they vote for.

Comment_arrow

Atlant Schmidt

7:56 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

JGONH:

Yes -- we know a significant number of them are poor white Southerners who *ALWAYS* vote for the Republicans cause the Republicans will stand up for their guns and god and against the evil gays and gyns!

Comment_arrow

David Breignan

1:19 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Good for you SoxPats.....tell me, what flavor is your koolaid?

Stephen D. Clark

6:47 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Hillary Clinton in 2016 will be a juggernaut. The closest thing the Republican Party can produce to rival her is Jeb Bush, but he doesn't have anything near her gravitas and popularity.

Leave it to the Democratic Party to break new ground. We are going to produce another "first" when we nominate Hillary Clinton for president in 2016. There will be excitement and fervor as the United States once again moves into the future with the first female American president ever. And she will be a Democrat because the Republican Party always lags the Democratic Party in expanding opportunity to the once disenfranchised.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patriot

7:20 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Until they pull another Obama out of the closet.

Comment_arrow

Proud Conservative

9:21 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. If it weren't for Abe, we'd still have a huge population of disenfranchised slaves. So don't tell me Democrats are on the forefront off "expanding opportunity for the once disenfranchised." The only thing the Democrats do for the disenfranchised is promise them expanded entitlements in exchange for their vote on election day.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:12 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

When you have to reach way back to Abraham Lincoln to prove that the Republican Party is not racist today, you tend, against your own assertion, to reinforce the point that it is.

I can give an example much more current than 1864: We Democratic Party voters nominated an African American as our presidential candidate - twice. That's not a quid pro quo arrangement of benefits for votes. It is an important moral step forward, both materially and symbolically. Democrats sent National Guard troops into Alabama to enforce desegregation fifty years ago. That wasn't a bribe to minorities. Democrats elected the first ever Muslim into Congress. That's not a bribe.

Republicans have never nominated a minority for president, excepting Mitt Romney, who is basically a W.A.S.P. with a Mormon twist. Hardly adventuresome there.

We Democrats will nominate a woman for our presidential candidate before the Republican Party will nominate a woman, and we will garner all the excitement and enthusiasm for it first. Eat our dust.

"Ashamed conservative," I won't accuse you of lying because I know you believe the crap you spouted, but it's wrong. However, it also makes you look bad to say such prejudicial stuff, and that's the silver lining in your statements.

You're accusing minorities of special corruption. You impugn their integrity, and that will only hurt Republican ambitions because minority votes are crucial to political power these days. So keep it up. You'll lose.

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

10:34 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Stephen- you Democrat party voters nominated a black man who is half white. Don't try to claim your hilier then thou. You Democrat party people also attacked the personal reputations of Sarah Palin, Allen West, Hermain Cain. At the Republican National Convention, MSNBC didn't broadcast speeches by minority members of the Republican party and then MSNBC claimed the party lacked diversity.
Republicans elected the first female Hispanic Governor, the first black Congressmen in Florida.

The only Hispanic Senator is Menendez, from NJ, whom the Democrat dominated press is largly ignoring the allegations that he had sex with an underage prostitute in the Dominican Republic.

Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

10:49 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. If it weren't for Abe, we'd still have a huge population of disenfranchised slaves. So don't tell me Democrats are on the forefront off "expanding opportunity for the once disenfranchised."

HAHAHA how pathetic is that?

You HAD Abraham Lincoln over 100 years ago, but he's been replaced in the Republican Party in the 21st Century with "Blaaaaaahhh people" Rick Santorum.

Actually, Democrats do more than expand badly needed entitlements.

They fund education so the disenfranchised can work hard and EARN their way, they support minimum wage so people can at least maintain subsistence while they work toward advancement.

Democrats are for teaching a man to fish,
Neocon Republicans are for slavery by another name.

Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

11:01 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"Until they pull another Obama out of the closet."

The "Know Nothings" of the Republican Party are alive and well in 2013. Who would have thought after 160 years, they would resurface again?

No one "pulled Obama out of the closet", Hillary was the favorite in the Democratic Party in 2008, she was ahead in the primaries and in the polls, Obama was losing the primary, but came from behind and won, all due to his hard work and intellect.
Patriot,
Stop watching Fox, it's distorting your view..

Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

11:19 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"You Democrat party people also attacked the personal reputations of Sarah Palin, Allen West, Hermain Cain."

Ahh, Mr. Salemvoter,

no one did more damage to the personal reputation of Palin, West, and Cain than Palin, West, and Cain.

All the attacks in the world from the "Democrat Party" (There is no such party, however, there is a Democratic Party) pale in comparison to the bumbling performance of these three stooges over the past five years.

Your guys at Fox kicked Palin out (talk about getting money for nothing), the voters rejected West due to his incoherent ranting, and Cain's womanizing did him in.

Try reality based thinking for a change.

Comment_arrow

Bill from Merrimack

1:11 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I've voted for woman and for people with a many different genetic backgrounds. But never BECAUSE of it, I vote for the person I think is best. There seems to be a good sized group of people who apply this sort of electorate Affirmative Action. I wonder how their numbers weigh compared to the racists/sexist etc and how it balances.

I think that independent of policy and politics that she showed the kind of work ethic and commitment that earn respect form people in both parties. She's going to be a powerhouse in 2016 unless something drastic changes.

If the Old Boy network can get one more win I think it would be with Jeb Bush, but I don't like his odds against Hillary. I think the Democrats are more afraid of center-right candidate with a platform like the one Geraldo is using in Jersey. I doubt a RINO candidate could survive the primary though, not yet.

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

2:57 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Ray- thanks for proving my point. As you say "three stooges"....... a sign of respect?

You watch MSNBC too much.

Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

6:01 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Salem voter,
you're too "hilier than thou".

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:29 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"Salem Voter," the Democratic Party is far more responsible for helping African Americans achieve civil equality in the past 70 years than the Republican Party.

Franklin Roosevelt barred discrimination against African Americans for hiring and promotions in government jobs. Harry Truman opened up the armed services. JFK sent troops into Alabama and Mississippi to enforce desegregation. All along it was the Democratic Party doing the most to make these advances. Republicans resisted, citing states' rights.

Richard Nixon began to harvest southern white resentment on civil rights with what became known as the "Southern Strategy." It's still alive today. It is so notorious that former RNC chairman, Ken Mehlman, went before the NAACP and apologized for it in 2005.

"RNC Chief to Say It Was 'Wrong' to Exploit Racial Conflict for Votes" (Thursday, July 14, 2005)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/13/AR2005071302342.html

Newt Gingrich, in the most recent Republican primaries, called African Americans lazy and shiftless when he said that he wanted to give African Americans jobs, not food stamps.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:43 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Hillary's competency for the job of president is known. She's up to snuff.

Given the choice between two candidates, both presumably qualified for the job, then it's perfectly reasonable to vote for the woman because it's about time we had a woman president.

But of course I wouldn't vote for Sarah Palin for that reason because she's obviously incompetent for the job. She'd run off in the middle of her term to make a Hollywood movie if she got the chance. President-y stuff is hard!

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

9:42 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Stephen-points well taken. Yet, you write as if Republicans have done nothing to advance minorities in this country. Colin Powell, Condeleeza Rice...ever hear of them? You do realize that they were firsts in each of their positions....not because of their color or gender but because they were the most qualified. I think of this because Gov Patrick appointment last week of an interim Senator, Gov Patrick said "race and gender definately played a role in his decision process".

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

9:45 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Stephen- while talking about civil rights. I forgot that you are from the party of Klu Klux Klan marshal Robert Byrd (D)
August 6, 1965 - Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

August 4, 1965 - Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose

March 21, 1965 - Republican federal judge Frank Johnson authorizes Martin Luther King’s protest march from Selma to Montgomery, overruling Democrat Governor George Wallace

June 20, 1964 - The Chicago Defender, renowned African-American newspaper, praises Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) for leading passage of 1964 Civil Rights Act

June 10, 1964 - Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality

June 9, 1964 - Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

9:46 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Stephen- want some more;
January 27, 1964 - U.S. Senator Margaret Chase Smith (R-ME), first woman to be considered for nomination by a major party, announces candidacy for President; she finishes 2nd at Republican National Convention

May 2, 1963 - Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

July 27, 1960 - At Republican National Convention, Vice President and eventual presidential nominee Richard Nixon insists on strong civil rights plank in platform

May 6, 1960 - President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

February 4, 1959 - President Eisenhower informs Republican leaders of his plan to introduce 1960 Civil Rights Act, despite staunch opposition from many Democrats

June 23, 1958 - President Dwight Eisenhower meets with Martin Luther King and other African-American leaders to discuss plans to advance civil rights

Comment_arrow

salemvoter

9:49 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Stephen- shall I go on. in 1957 President Eisenhower deployed US troops to Little Rock to force integration of the schools!!!!!!

September 24, 1957 - Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys U.S. troops to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

September 9, 1957 - President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

November 6, 1956 - African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President

July 9, 1955 - Republican attorney E. Frederic Morrow becomes first African-American executive in White House; served as advisor to President Dwight Eisenhower

May 17, 1954 - Chief Justice Earl Warren, three-term Republican Governor (CA) and Republican vice presidential nominee in 1948, wins unanimous support of Supreme Court for school desegregation in Brown v. Board of Education

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

10:59 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Notice your cutoff dates, Salem Voter. Republicans stopped advocating for minority civil rights right around the 1960 mark. Shortly thereafter, Richard Nixon begins to deploy the Republican Party's notorious "southern strategy" - the one former RNC chief Ken Mehlman apologized to the NAACP for.

African Americans begin voting Democratic right around the same time. Not because they were getting all kinds of free goodies, but because their staunchest allies in the civil rights struggle were Democrats. Also, at the same time, the Republican Party begins to slide farther rightward, becoming less liberal and shedding the northeastern "Rockefeller Republicans" while becoming more conservative and swelling with southern and western "states' rights" libertarian/conservatives. Ideology begins to matter more.

Back to the African American experience: What is the key ideological difference between liberals (Democrats) and conservatives (Republicans)? Isn't it the dispute over the role of the state? How do you think African Americans think they would have fared if the role of the federal government in desegregation had been suppressed in favor of local control of civil rights?

African Americans identify with liberals because liberal ideology believes in the occasional intervention of the national government, which is exactly what African Americans needed to advance their own civil rights. African Americans vote Democratic because they're liberal.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

11:18 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Furthermore, African Americans don't vote Republican because of the changes happening in the Republican Party. Barry Goldwater was the party's nominee in 1964. He campaigned against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He was for nonintervention in the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, and cited "states' rights."

Over the next decade and a half, the GOP came to be, more and more, a party of "Goldwater Republicans." Ronald Reagan called himself one. Reagan launched his general election campaign by citing his support for states' rights at Neshoba County Fair in Philadelphia, Mississippi, where three young civil rights workers were murdered in 1964, the most notorious crime of the civil rights era.

Exploiting southern white resentment against federal civil rights interventions in the deep south got Republicans lots of votes. It brought them new converts. Strom Thurmond was an early switch. He changed from Democrat to Republican because he thought the Democrats were becoming too liberal with regard to desegregation, and he found more sympathy in the Republican Party which was eager for the votes of disgruntled southern whites.

So, not only do African Americans think that Democrats are more sympathetic to their interests, but so do (did) many former Democrats who became Republicans for the exact same reason - Strom Thurmond. Kehn Mehlman and the NAACP. If Democrats are so delusional about racism in the GOP, then why did Mehlman apologize?

Because of his conscience.

Comment_arrow

David Breignan

1:26 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

So many libby's... so little time. You all are too stupid to see the impending doom this sorry excuse for leadership is doing to our country. You sit back chanting "O-bama- O-bama" and are to blinded by your love for him. Much like those who suffered under Stalin, Hitler and other dictators (of yes, libby's, Barry wants to BE a dictator)

You are like the fool hearted barnyard animals in George Orwell's classic "Animal Farm." Wake up sheep.....the Pigs are walking on their hind legs and its going to be too late once you realize it.

Oh course, why bother wasting my time telling you this....trying to speak logic to a liberal is like trying to spit into the wind and not get wet. Futile.

David Pittelli

8:08 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

While Ms. Clinton traveled a lot as Secretary of State, I am having trouble recalling all of her successes while in that office. I do recall that she is the woman whose husband bought her Senate seat in part with the pardons of 16 Puerto Rican terrorists, as well as of Hasidic community leaders who had embezzled $30 million from the U.S. government.

Reply

Proud Conservative

9:26 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Let's see........I'm trying to think of one success Hillary had........
Hmmmmm......... hmmmm......... oh well...it may come to me later.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patriot

5:06 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

The White House said today that in 1978 Hillary Rodham Clinton invested $1,000 in commodities futures and that the investment grew in 10 months of trading in the notoriously volatile market into a gain of nearly $100,000.
*
She married Bill kept him out of jail and made millions!!!!

Seamus Carty

12:01 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Her testimony on Benghazi will sink her hopes in 2016. The democrats have moved on. Look for Deval Patrick or some other younger Democrat to get the nomination...

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Pittelli

8:35 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

I hope you are right. But the Democrats apparently liked her insane testimony. And people have short memories.

Comment_arrow

Stephen D. Clark

7:47 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Hillary's testimony before Congress did her good. She came across as fiery and impatient with fools. Of course the right didn't like it. They were her target, and she came across as strong and in control.

Seamus Carty

12:05 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Gee, I wonder if the families of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods agree that we should be proud of Hillary Clinton's service...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

12:28 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

You are calling me a child for mentioning the four dead Americans? This was caused by the negligence of Hilary Clinton's state department. The fish rots from the head down...

Proud Conservative

5:41 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

The Democratic establishment will back Jabberin' Joe Biden in 2016. Don't forget....those who supported Obama in the past two elections also supported Foot-in-Mouth Joe since he was part of the deal. That should pretty much cost them the election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

No Longer interested

10:42 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

You should hope for a split Democratic camp since the GOP has had nothing but a parade of losers in the last two elections.

Comment_arrow

Patriot

5:08 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Bill Clinton was considered a loser and look how great he turned out!

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

12:29 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

There is no way they'll nominate Joe Biden. They want to win.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

12:30 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

"You should hope for a split Democratic camp since the GOP has had nothing but a parade of losers in the last two elections."

Is that just presidential elections or are you including 2010? The democrats had the parade of losers in 2010..

Billnh

7:49 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Are you proud of her performance on Libia ?

Reply

No Longer interested

10:36 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Based on all the shrill wailing, whining, and gnashing of teeth on the part of the right wing neocon tin-foil hat crowd, you know Hillary is doing something right...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patriot

12:52 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

She quit!!!!!!!!
*
Look at the second string!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Really??

7:38 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Hillary Clinton was received with a standing ovation by her employees at the State department and went out the same way. Never in the history of the State Department was a Secretary of State so admired by people who were in the know.

Really??

5:31 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Who would have guessed, the same old right wing nut bags came out to bash another great American....

Reply

Really??

8:39 am on Sunday, February 3, 2013

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), harped moronically about the initial report that the attack had been mounted spontaneously as a reaction to an anti-Islam YouTube video.

"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans," Clinton responded, raising her voice at Johnson, who continued to interrupt her. "Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk last night who decided to kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Clinton continued, defending the State Department's efforts in the wake of the assault. "Honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is people were trying their best in real time to get to the best information," she said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/hillary-clinton-ron-johnson_n_2533819.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patriot

5:14 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2013

They knew and lied!!!!!!!!!!
*
It was a cover up and we don't know why or what they where covering up! It made NO sense to go around the world with the lie!

Comment_arrow

Really??

7:35 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Such childish though process from you on the rabid right. Not everything is a conspiracy.

Mark Alesse

4:24 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

She clung to her husband's coattails despite being humiliated by him serially. Why? For her own personal advancement. Her life has been one long lie, from the cattle futures investment to the deaths in Benghazi that she could have prevented. To admire her is to believe her lies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Really??

7:33 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

"She clung to her husband""Why?" Out of respect of the institution and love of her husband?

You need to stop watching the Conspiracy Channel(Faux News)

Patriot

4:54 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

We have reduced our ability to communicate or comprehend complicated material. Most of what we read or see is in sound bites. Just imagine our president arguing over what the meaning of "is, is."
I love it when someone says "I never seen that document." That creates 5 more questions that demand an answer.
And Hilary was on the prosecution team for Water Gate. No wonder she alluded Whitewater.
Nothing slicker than a Clinton!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Really??

7:39 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

"We have reduced our ability to communicate"
This post is a perfect example of that.

Comment_arrow

David Breignan

1:32 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

You know...all this fighting online is getting us no where. Maybe we should just buy an island and let the libby's and RINO's live on it. The rest of us REAL AMERICANS who love our country and love the constitution could stay here. Everyone would be happy and the libby's and RINO's would be dead within 10 yrs (because they would have NO money, NO food, NO real leadership and NO idea how to run anything. Problem solved.

Really??

7:38 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Hillary Clinton was received with a standing ovation by her employees at the State Department and went out the same way. Never in the history of the State Department was a Secretary of State so admired by people who were in the know.

Reply

Patriot

12:55 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Would have made a great president, if she where only black enough for those racist democrats.

Reply

Patriot

1:47 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I could name so many people that where all well received, history is cluttered with them. I know 4 people and the one they left behind that are not. (where not)

Reply

Patriot

4:12 pm on Thursday, February 7, 2013

Monroe doctrine, the Marshall plan, so many great things to think about. Other than Hilary being a woman what has she done that will mark her accomplishment in history. Read about Henry Kissinger, real Nobel Prize winner.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger

Reply

News Flash

3:35 am on Friday, April 12, 2013

North Korea capable of arming missile with nuclear warhead, according to the Pentagon

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/12/north-korea-capable-arming-missile-with-nuclear-warhead-according-to-pentagon/#ixzz2QFByceWv

This is a failure of Hillary.

Reply

MatureCitizen

9:12 am on Friday, April 12, 2013

Hillary Clinton.. realy.. back to the meds haha

Reply

Leave a comment